Child Abuse in Maryland Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Child Abuse in Maryland - Research Paper Example However, the Child Protection Services is failing in protecting children reported as living in harm. â€Å"Almost five children die every day as a result of child abuse. More than three of four children are under the age of four† (Statement 1). The high rate of death in children is abnormal. In fact, â€Å"A report of child abuse is made every ten seconds† (Statement 1). With such a high volume of reports, one would think that the CPS would immediately remove a high-risk child from the home into a safe environment. However, the Child Protection Services is not doing that. This is because Child Protection Services’ priority is to keep children with their families. As such, it sends abused children back in abusive homes. Ideally, it requires a stable environment and much care to ensure that children grow well. The way a child grows up determines his future a lot. Therefore, for us to protect the lives of the children and ensure a better youth society, children in d angerous families must come out from the abusive families and transfer to stable environment for better care. Since the Child Protective Services fails in doing this, then there is adequate need to reform it. Otherwise, the world will lose a lot in childcare and bringing up a stable and sober society. According to the â€Å"Maryland Department of Human Resources,† Child Protective Services is a governmental organization that offers service that helps in creation of a safe environment for children from abusive homes and those in harm. The Child Protective Services (CPS) claims to rebuild and promote a positive home by teaching parents how to provide and care for their children. In addition, with the support of the family, CPS also attempts to find the root causes of the parental abuse claims and seeks to solve these problems. In most cases, child abuse claims are social problems requiring social solutions from the society and not legal actions. However, exactly what causes par ental abuse? Parental child abuse may arise from immature and unrealistic expectations, stresses of child care, unmet emotional needs, drug or alcohol problems, economic crisis, difficulty in relationships, domestic violence, depression or other mental health problems, and lack of parenting knowledge, poor moral standards, poor performance in school, and favoring some children (Prevent Child Abuse New York 1). If a child abuse claim investigator finds a major risk to the child’s well being, then the child will be removed from the home and placed in temporary care with either a stable family member or foster home. However, because a child is more likely to thrive with their parents, the CPS has to return the child to their abusive family. This happens after a given detailed teaching period on the parents. After a given period, the ways of living will become much better for the child and parent. At this point, the investigator will successfully close the case and move on to ano ther abuse claim (DHR). According to, â€Å"A More Aggressive Child Protection System Would Reduce Child Abuse,† a major reason that child deaths are drastically rising in the United States is because funding for the child protection program continues to get a funding cut. Lack of funding for child protection is inexcusable and creates catastrophic damage to the child if there are needs that

Rebuttal Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Rebuttal Argument - Essay Example Furthermore, studying the article is necessary in order to acknowledge that there are companies that consider diversity training as one of the tools that led their companies into success. According to Dobbin, Kalev, and Kelly, diversity training is an expensive training tool. The researchers added that this process only has extremely few and even no effects on companies that practice diversity training. Also, diversity training is only present because it is mandated by law. Furthermore, this obligatory training cannot at all eliminate biases that are already engraved within employees (611). One of the points of the article is that diversity training does not work. Nonetheless, it is important to provide a concrete definition of diversity training that can easily be grasped by the audience. This may be a small part of the argument, but defining it in a simpler manner will bring light to the heavy issue being tackled. In this case, it is essential to define diversity training as a prog ram that enables employees and future employees to give importance to diversity. This training also aims in lessening discrimination in the workplace (Ford and Fisher qtd. in Konrad, Prasad, and Pringle 63). Furthermore, in any business, it is essential to be constantly reminded that the employees are the most vital tool for the success of a company. Therefore, with this fact, it is inevitable that a company or a business will fund for the continuous training and learning of its employees, which also include diversity training. The article emphasizes, as supported by a research that there have been no positive implications of diversity training. It cited that there has been no increase of female or minority managers in companies. However, it is indispensable to acknowledge that diversity training does not only aim to increase the number of female or minority managers, but it aims to allow an efficient and productive working environment for every individual. Such as in Sodexo, a serv ice company that manages food and facilities services which incorporates diversity learning materials to its business philosophies. The company had successfully incorporated diversity training in all aspect of the company which led the company to$14.8 billion revenue (Anand and Winters 363). In addition, diversity training aims to discuss the similarities and differences of every individual and to inform every employee of the legalities of prejudices in the working environment (Tropp 183). Also, diversity training is composed of different methods and approaches; therefore, holistically considering it with no positive implications to a company will be unfair. The different approaches and methods bring different results, and with a continuous improvement and usage of different approaches, a company will eventually find the right model for its industry and employees. Also, in the article, it cited that diversity training produces backlash and that it could also produce and ignite biase s. Moreover, the result of the study also shows that there is the stereotypes and the biases that are already inculcated within the employees cannot be easily diminished in a one-day seminar or workshop in relation to diversity in the workplace (Dobbin, Kalev, and Kelly 591 and 611). In contrary, diversity training must be inculcated in every employee and must become a habit. It is